AI architectural visualisation

Most AI architectural imagery fails the moment anyone who knows the project looks closely. It drifts off the geometry, invents context, and reaches for the same glassy, placeless gloss whatever the brief. That is a direction problem rather than a limitation of the tools.

We use AI where it genuinely helps: thirty directions where there used to be three, at the stage when the design is still open. Underneath sits real geometry and a locked camera, so the frames stay accountable to the scheme. The output is a persuasive image that an architect can put in front of a client without having to explain what is not real.

Will the image match our model?

Yes where it needs to. The frames are built on your geometry with the camera locked, so the massing, openings and viewpoint are accountable to the model rather than reinterpreted.

Is our project data used to train AI models?

No. No client data, model or imagery is ever used to train public AI models, and project material is held only for the retention window agreed with you.

Can you imitate a particular artist's style?

No. We do not imitate a living artist's signature style on request. References are translated into an original direction framework instead.

What do you need to start?

Rough 3D or sketches are enough. The less resolved the model, the more the direction conversation matters, which is why it comes first.

Is AI imagery acceptable for planning?

Where accuracy is critical we work to a geometry-locked standard with no invented context. Our AI policy is published so you can share it with a consultant or a committee.